Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Entertainment and Sports Law
Department
Health, Exercise, and Sport Sciences Department
ISSN
1748-944X
Volume
6
Issue
1
DOI
10.16997/eslj.63
First Page
1
Last Page
11
Publication Date
June 2008
Abstract
Statements found in the NCAA Manual and made by the NCAA President emphasize the primacy of academic success for college athletes. However the reality of a ‘meaningful education’ is often elusive due to the multitude of competing interests. College athletes must balance academic success with the extensive time demands of athletic competition, practice, travel, conditioning, watching game film, etc. Often, this balancing act proves unsuccessful insofar as it pertains to the achievement of educational goals. To date, there has been little legal recourse available for aggrieved college athletes who wish to argue that they have been unfairly deprived of the opportunity for a meaningful education. Educational malpractice lawsuits have been unsuccessful and contractual recourse for students has been limited to cases in which specific promises have been breached by a university. The authors argue, however, that college athletes should be able to rely upon a university’s good faith efforts to provide a meaningful education. If a university fails to act in good faith a cause of action based on a breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing should be available to the college athlete.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Ciccolella, M. E.,
Sharp, L. A.,
&
Krueger, K.
(2008).
Good faith and fair dealing: the implied duty to meaningfully educate the college athlete..
Entertainment and Sports Law, 6(1), 1–11.
DOI: 10.16997/eslj.63
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cop-facarticles/368