Beyond the Bottle: Evaluating the Effects of Feedback on College Students’ Self-Reports of Alcohol Consumption and Standard Drink Free-Pours

Poster Number

27

Lead Author Affiliation

Psychology

Lead Author Status

Masters Student

Second Author Affiliation

Psychology

Second Author Status

Faculty

Third Author Affiliation

Psychology

Third Author Status

Undergraduate - Junior

Fourth Author Affiliation

Psychology

Fourth Author Status

Undergraduate - Junior

Fifth Author Affiliation

Psychology

Fifth Author Status

Undergraduate - Junior

Research or Creativity Area

Social Sciences

Abstract

Some researchers suggest that providing college students feedback on their free pours of alcohol improves the accuracy of their self-reported drinking. However, few researchers compare behavioral measures to self-report, so the effects of feedback remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of feedback on college students’ self-report of alcohol consumption and their free pours. We replicated a study (White et al., 2005) and extended it by including a second free-pour, after receiving feedback, to observe if the accuracy of the free-pour improved. The participants, 12 college students, completed an alcohol consumption questionnaire, defined the ounces in and provided free-pours of what they believed to be standard servings of various alcoholic beverages. They completed these activities during baseline, after reading informational sheets from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), and then again after receiving feedback on their baseline free-pours. No participants in baseline accurately poured a standard serving of beer and no participants' definition of free pours corresponded to their free pour. After baseline, nine participants were able to accurately pour a standard serving of beer but three participants' definitions did not correspond to their free pour. Results indicate that feedback was effective to improve accuracy of free pours and definitions. However, there were important differences in the stated definitions compared to the free pour. Looking at the individual data points, there is much variability while the aggregated data does not accurately represent the individual participants. These discrepancies have important implications for the reliability and validity of college students’ self-reported alcohol consumption, and thus our understanding of the effects of alcohol consumption.

Location

Don and Karen DeRosa University Center (DUC) Poster Hall

Start Date

27-4-2024 10:30 AM

End Date

27-4-2024 12:30 PM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 27th, 10:30 AM Apr 27th, 12:30 PM

Beyond the Bottle: Evaluating the Effects of Feedback on College Students’ Self-Reports of Alcohol Consumption and Standard Drink Free-Pours

Don and Karen DeRosa University Center (DUC) Poster Hall

Some researchers suggest that providing college students feedback on their free pours of alcohol improves the accuracy of their self-reported drinking. However, few researchers compare behavioral measures to self-report, so the effects of feedback remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of feedback on college students’ self-report of alcohol consumption and their free pours. We replicated a study (White et al., 2005) and extended it by including a second free-pour, after receiving feedback, to observe if the accuracy of the free-pour improved. The participants, 12 college students, completed an alcohol consumption questionnaire, defined the ounces in and provided free-pours of what they believed to be standard servings of various alcoholic beverages. They completed these activities during baseline, after reading informational sheets from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), and then again after receiving feedback on their baseline free-pours. No participants in baseline accurately poured a standard serving of beer and no participants' definition of free pours corresponded to their free pour. After baseline, nine participants were able to accurately pour a standard serving of beer but three participants' definitions did not correspond to their free pour. Results indicate that feedback was effective to improve accuracy of free pours and definitions. However, there were important differences in the stated definitions compared to the free pour. Looking at the individual data points, there is much variability while the aggregated data does not accurately represent the individual participants. These discrepancies have important implications for the reliability and validity of college students’ self-reported alcohol consumption, and thus our understanding of the effects of alcohol consumption.