Presentation Category
Literature Review
Introduction/Context/Diagnosis
Title:Comparison of Digital Impressions and Conventional Impressions in Dentistry Objective:This poster provides a comparative analysis of digital and conventional impression-taking methods in dentistry, assessing their performance in terms of speed, efficiency, cost, storage, impression transfer, visualization, dentist and patient acceptance, infection control, and patient education. Methods:Data from 15 research articles were meticulously reviewed, extracting insights to facilitate a comprehensive comparison. The poster integrates visual elements, including recorded images by the presenters, to augment the analysis. Results: Conventional impressions are lauded for their cost-effectiveness, reliability, and adherence to standardized protocols. Conversely, digital impressions offer enhanced precision, streamlined workflow, and improved patient experience, signaling a transformative shift in impression-taking practices. Conclusion: While digital impressions exhibit clear advantages, their widespread adoption hinges on factors such as initial investment costs, training requirements, and integration with existing workflows. Nevertheless, ongoing technological advancements and growing acceptance among dental professionals herald a promising future for digital impression systems in dental practice. In summary, this analysis underscores the nuanced strengths and limitations of both digital and conventional impression techniques, empowering dental practitioners to make informed decisions regarding impression-taking methodologies in clinical settings. Acknowledgments: This collaborative effort is indebted to the contributions of Dr. Kunal Sethi, Dr. Charan Teja Bobba, and Dr. Keerat Kuckreja (IDS 2025). Special gratitude is extended to our mentor, Dr. Jim Milani, for his invaluable guidance and support.
Location
Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
Format
Presentation
Comparison of Digital Impressions and Conventional Impressions in Dentistry
Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
Title:Comparison of Digital Impressions and Conventional Impressions in Dentistry Objective:This poster provides a comparative analysis of digital and conventional impression-taking methods in dentistry, assessing their performance in terms of speed, efficiency, cost, storage, impression transfer, visualization, dentist and patient acceptance, infection control, and patient education. Methods:Data from 15 research articles were meticulously reviewed, extracting insights to facilitate a comprehensive comparison. The poster integrates visual elements, including recorded images by the presenters, to augment the analysis. Results: Conventional impressions are lauded for their cost-effectiveness, reliability, and adherence to standardized protocols. Conversely, digital impressions offer enhanced precision, streamlined workflow, and improved patient experience, signaling a transformative shift in impression-taking practices. Conclusion: While digital impressions exhibit clear advantages, their widespread adoption hinges on factors such as initial investment costs, training requirements, and integration with existing workflows. Nevertheless, ongoing technological advancements and growing acceptance among dental professionals herald a promising future for digital impression systems in dental practice. In summary, this analysis underscores the nuanced strengths and limitations of both digital and conventional impression techniques, empowering dental practitioners to make informed decisions regarding impression-taking methodologies in clinical settings. Acknowledgments: This collaborative effort is indebted to the contributions of Dr. Kunal Sethi, Dr. Charan Teja Bobba, and Dr. Keerat Kuckreja (IDS 2025). Special gratitude is extended to our mentor, Dr. Jim Milani, for his invaluable guidance and support.
Comments/Acknowledgements
Presentation Category: IDS: First Year Literature Review