Taming the Untamable: Christian Attempts to Make Israel’s Election Universal
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Horizons in Biblical Theology
ISSN
0195-9085
Volume
33
Issue
1
DOI
10.1163/019590811X571698
First Page
24
Last Page
33
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Abstract
In this essay, the author suggests that contemporary ways of thinking about exclusion and particularism have profoundly affected contemporary interpretations of the Bible, both Old and New Testaments. This, the author suggests, becomes particularly evident when looking at the issue of Israel’s election. Through an examination of the theological interpretations of ovo evangelical Christian commentators on Deuteronomy, Christopher Wright and Gordon McConville, the author argues that each interpreter, to varying degrees, inappropriately reads a universal agenda into Deuteronomy in the service of Christian theology. I author maintains that a better approach is to accept the exclusive, particularistic nature of Deuteronomy (and of the Old Testament more generally) and to acknowledge that although a universal trajectory may be observed in the Bible overall, it should not be achieved through skewed readings of Deuteronomy, or at the cost of Israel’ s irrevocable-and thus enduring lection.
Recommended Citation
Lohr, J. N.
(2011).
Taming the Untamable: Christian Attempts to Make Israel’s Election Universal.
Horizons in Biblical Theology, 33(1), 24–33.
DOI: 10.1163/019590811X571698
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ed-facarticles/25
