Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport (JPS)
Department
Philosophy
ISSN
0094-8705
Volume
50
Issue
1
DOI
10.1080/00948705.2023.2176860
First Page
100
Last Page
115
Publication Date
2-15-2023
Abstract
Can a coach rightfully integrate a religious orientation in their coaching in a public institution? In its recent Kennedy v Bremerton School District (2022) decision, the U.S. Supreme Court defended the educational value of players’ exposure to diverse expressive activities as a part of learning how to live in a pluralistic society. I contend that religion-sport separation is the most philosophically defensible position, based primarily on the problems with supernatural theism in religions like Christianity. Nonetheless, there is a form of religion-sport integration that is theoretically possible within my critique of theism which could strengthen the inner morality of sport. I describe the two necessary conditions of this potential religion-sport integration but conclude that the problems with defining the ‘religious’ might ultimately strengthen my defense of religion-sport separation.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Recommended Citation
Matz, L.
(2023).
In defense of religion-sport separation in coaching.
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport (JPS), 50(1), 100–115.
DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2023.2176860
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cop-facarticles/865
Included in
Buddhist Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Philosophy Commons, Sports Studies Commons
Comments
Published version of the article can be viewed on the journal website here: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2023.2176860