Campus Access Only
All rights reserved. This publication is intended for use solely by faculty, students, and staff of University of the Pacific. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or later developed, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author or the publisher.
Date of Award
1990
Document Type
Dissertation - Pacific Access Restricted
Degree Name
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
Department
Education
First Advisor
Carol Bartell
First Committee Member
Dennis Brennan
Second Committee Member
Robert D. Morrow
Third Committee Member
Donald Duns
Fourth Committee Member
Patricia L. Roberts
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate secondary principals' self-perceived responsibilities and competencies in the area of instructional supervision, and thereby establish a baseline of knowledge for future decisions regarding the use of instructional supervision by principals as an aid to more effective teaching and learning. Procedure. A three-page questionnaire based on a list of supervision tasks (Harris, 1973) and guided by the literature on effective schools, instructional leadership, and instructional supervision was developed. The items were designed to assess responsibility for and competency in the area of instructional supervision. The questionnaire was sent to 619 randomly-sampled secondary principal-members of the National Association of Secondary School Principals. The responses to the five research questions were based on appropriate statistical procedures, including unpaired t-tests, chi square, factor analysis, and multiple regression. Findings. Forty-nine percent of the questionnaires were returned. Respondents were predominantly male from large, rural, public schools. Principals rated themselves significantly higher on the competency section of the questionnaire than on the responsibility section. There was little difference in the selection of the highest-ranking tasks for which principals perceived themselves to be responsible and the selection of highest-ranking tasks for which principals perceived themselves to be competent. Several variables influenced principals' self-perceptions about responsibility and competency in instructional supervision. On the competency section of the questionnaire, predictor variables were: (a) principal experience, (b) department head experience, (c) teaching experience, (d) central office experience, (e) curriculum supervision experience, (f) preparation to supervise, (g) school type, (h) number of teachers, (i) degree, and (j) gender. On the responsibility section of the questionnaire, predictor variables were: (a) teaching experience, (b) department head experience, (c) preparation to supervise, (d) school type, (e) number of teachers, and (f) degree. The most frequent influence variables were school type, and preparation to supervise. Public school principals rated themselves higher than private school principals and participation in workshops appeared to be the best determinant of responsibility and competency in the area of instructional supervision. Recommendations. Universities and colleges, in cooperation with school districts, should examine their administrator training programs to provide for the growing need to educate principals in the area of instructional supervision. For in-service principals, a workshop approach is highly recommended. In order to provide time to supervise instruction effectively, principals should be given more assistance in some of the bureaucracy, discipline, and "administrivia" they experience daily. Principals should become more involved in curriculum decisions and gain support from the teachers in the supervision process.
Pages
190
Recommended Citation
Kellough, Noreen Gail Whyte. (1990). Secondary principals' self-perceptions of their responsibilities and competencies for instructional supervision. University of the Pacific, Dissertation - Pacific Access Restricted. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/3419
To access this thesis/dissertation you must have a valid pacific.edu email address and log-in to Scholarly Commons.
Find in PacificSearch Find in ProQuestIf you are the author and would like to grant permission to make your work openly accessible, please email
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).