Comparison of the effectiveness of 3 manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial
ORCiD
Davenport: 0000-0001-5772-7727
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
ISSN
0190-6011
Volume
39
Issue
1
DOI
10.2519/jospt.2009.39.1.A13
First Page
A16
Last Page
A16
Publication Date
1-1-2009
Abstract
Recently a clinical prediction rule (CPR) that identifies patients with LBP that are likely to respond rapidly and dramatically to thrust manipulation has been developed and validated. The CPR was developed using 1 specific thrust manipulation technique. It is not known if the results obtained using the CPR would generalize to different thrust manipulation techniques, or to nonthrust manipulation procedures. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to examine the generalizability of the CPR to different thrust and nonthrust manipulation techniques.
Recommended Citation
Cleland, J. A.,
Fritz, J. M.,
Kulig, K.,
Davenport, T. E.,
Eberhart, S.,
&
Magel, J. S.
(2009).
Comparison of the effectiveness of 3 manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial.
Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 39(1), A16–A16.
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2009.39.1.A13
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/phs-facarticles/118
