Reliability and validity of Short Form 36 Version 2 to measure health perceptions in a sub-group of individuals with fatigue
ORCiD
Davenport: 0000-0001-5772-7727
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Disability and Rehabilitation
ISSN
0963-8288
Volume
33
Issue
25-26
DOI
10.3109/09638288.2011.582925
First Page
2596
Last Page
2604
Publication Date
6-1-2011
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the validity and reliability of Short Form 36 Version 2 (SF36v2) in sub-groups of individuals with fatigue.
Method: Thirty subjects participated in this study, including n == 16 subjects who met case definition criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and n == 14 non-disabled sedentary matched control subjects. SF36v2 and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) were administered before two maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) administered 24 h apart and an open-ended recovery questionnaire was administered 7 days after CPET challenge. The main outcome measures were self-reported time to recover to pre-challenge functional and symptom status, frequency of post-exertional symptoms and SF36v2 sub-scale scores.
Results: Individuals with CFS demonstrated significantly lower SF36v2 and MFI-20 sub-scale scores prior to CPET. Between-group differences remained significant post-CPET, however, there were no significant group by test interaction effects. Subjects with CFS reported significantly more total symptoms (p < 0.001), as well as reports of fatigue (p < 0.001), neuroendocrine (p < 0.001), immune (p < 0.01), pain (p < 0.01) and sleep disturbance (p < 0.01) symptoms than control subjects as a result of CPET. Many symptom counts demonstrated significant relationships with SF36v2 sub-scale scores (p < 0.05). SF36v2 and MFI-20 sub-scale scores demonstrated significant correlations (p < 0.05). Various SF36v2 sub-scale scores demonstrated significant predictive validity to identify subjects who recovered from CPET challenge within 1 day and 7 days (p < 0.05). Potential floor effects were observed for both questionnaires for individuals with CFS.
Conclusion: Various sub-scales of SF36v2 demonstrated adequate reliability and validity for clinical and research applications. Adequacy of sensitivity to change of SF36v2 as a result of a fatiguing stressor should be the subject of additional study.
Recommended Citation
Davenport, T. E.,
Stevens, S. R.,
Baroni, K.,
VanNess, J. M.,
&
Snell, C. R.
(2011).
Reliability and validity of Short Form 36 Version 2 to measure health perceptions in a sub-group of individuals with fatigue.
Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25-26), 2596–2604.
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.582925
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/phs-facarticles/106