Presentation Category
Literature Review
Introduction/Context/Diagnosis
Abstract: Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different gingival retraction systems, including cords, paste, and laser, for creating adequate gingival retraction in preparation for indirect restorations. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to gather relevant studies and clinical trials comparing the use of cords, paste, and laser for gingival retraction. Various databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies were included based on their relevance to the topic and their methodological rigor. Results: The review revealed that each gingival retraction system has its own advantages and limitations. Traditional cord techniques offer effective tissue displacement but may cause discomfort to patients and require meticulous handling. Gingival retraction pastes provide a convenient and less invasive alternative but may not achieve adequate retraction in all cases. Laser-assisted gingival retraction offers precise tissue management with minimal discomfort, although equipment costs and operator expertise are significant considerations. Conclusions: The choice of gingival retraction system should be based on the specific clinical scenario, patient preferences, and practitioner expertise. While traditional cord techniques remain widely used and effective, newer methods such as gingival retraction pastes and laser-assisted techniques offer promising alternatives with their own unique benefits. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with these different approaches. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of all researchers and clinicians whose work has contributed to the understanding of gingival retraction systems. Additionally, the authors express gratitude to the participants of the included studies whose participation made this review possible.
Location
Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
Format
Presentation
Tissue Management for Indirect Restorations Using Gingival Retraction Systems
Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
Abstract: Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different gingival retraction systems, including cords, paste, and laser, for creating adequate gingival retraction in preparation for indirect restorations. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to gather relevant studies and clinical trials comparing the use of cords, paste, and laser for gingival retraction. Various databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies were included based on their relevance to the topic and their methodological rigor. Results: The review revealed that each gingival retraction system has its own advantages and limitations. Traditional cord techniques offer effective tissue displacement but may cause discomfort to patients and require meticulous handling. Gingival retraction pastes provide a convenient and less invasive alternative but may not achieve adequate retraction in all cases. Laser-assisted gingival retraction offers precise tissue management with minimal discomfort, although equipment costs and operator expertise are significant considerations. Conclusions: The choice of gingival retraction system should be based on the specific clinical scenario, patient preferences, and practitioner expertise. While traditional cord techniques remain widely used and effective, newer methods such as gingival retraction pastes and laser-assisted techniques offer promising alternatives with their own unique benefits. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with these different approaches. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of all researchers and clinicians whose work has contributed to the understanding of gingival retraction systems. Additionally, the authors express gratitude to the participants of the included studies whose participation made this review possible.
Comments/Acknowledgements
Presentation Category: IDS: First Year Literature Review