Presentation Category
Literature Review
Introduction/Context/Diagnosis
Abstract: This research provides a comprehensive analysis of three predominant dental restoration methods: removable dentures, fixed bridges, and dental implants. By focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of removable dentures, this study aims to elucidate the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction associated with each treatment option. Removable dentures offer a non-invasive and cost-effective solution for tooth replacement, which can be particularly appealing for patients with extensive tooth loss or those looking for a temporary solution while considering long-term options. However, they may not offer the same stability and aesthetic appeal as their fixed counterparts or implants. This study leverages patient surveys, clinical outcome data, and a review of the current literature to provide a holistic view of these dental restoration methods. The findings aim to guide dental practitioners in making informed decisions and recommending the most suitable treatment options to their patients, considering both functional and aesthetic outcomes. Ultimately, this research underscores the importance of personalized patient care and the need for continued innovation in dental prosthetics to enhance quality of life for individuals with tooth loss. and also the 3 scenarios below Scenario 1: Removable Dentures Patient Profile: A 65-year-old retired teacher with extensive tooth loss due to age and periodontal disease, seeking an affordable and non-invasive solution. Scenario: The patient has a limited budget and prefers a solution that doesn't require surgical intervention. The patient values ease of maintenance and the ability to adjust or replace the dentures if necessary. Suitability: Removable dentures are most suitable for this patient due to their cost-effectiveness and non-invasive nature. They provide a functional and aesthetic solution without the need for surgery, making it an ideal choice for patients with extensive tooth loss or those who prefer a less permanent option. Scenario 2: Fixed Bridges Patient Profile: A 45-year-old professional with one missing tooth between two healthy teeth, looking for a durable and aesthetically pleasing solution. Scenario: The patient is concerned about the longevity and appearance of the dental restoration. They have a stable oral health condition and prefer a solution that blends seamlessly with their natural teeth. Suitability: A fixed bridge is most suitable for this patient because it offers a durable, stable, and cosmetically appealing solution. The bridge uses the adjacent healthy teeth as anchors, providing a natural-looking replacement that can last many years with proper care. Scenario 3: Dental Implants Patient Profile: A 50-year-old avid traveler with a single missing tooth and excellent bone density, seeking a long-term and stable solution. Scenario: The patient is active and wants a worry-free solution that allows them to eat, speak, and travel without concerns about their dental restoration. They are in good overall health and willing to undergo a surgical procedure for a lasting result. Suitability: Dental implants are most suitable for this patient due to their durability, stability, and natural function. Implants are anchored directly into the jawbone, offering a permanent solution that mimics the look and feel of natural teeth. This option is ideal for patients seeking the most stable and long-term solution to tooth loss.
Location
Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
Format
Presentation
Smile Solutions: Choosing Your Perfect Fits
Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA
Abstract: This research provides a comprehensive analysis of three predominant dental restoration methods: removable dentures, fixed bridges, and dental implants. By focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of removable dentures, this study aims to elucidate the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction associated with each treatment option. Removable dentures offer a non-invasive and cost-effective solution for tooth replacement, which can be particularly appealing for patients with extensive tooth loss or those looking for a temporary solution while considering long-term options. However, they may not offer the same stability and aesthetic appeal as their fixed counterparts or implants. This study leverages patient surveys, clinical outcome data, and a review of the current literature to provide a holistic view of these dental restoration methods. The findings aim to guide dental practitioners in making informed decisions and recommending the most suitable treatment options to their patients, considering both functional and aesthetic outcomes. Ultimately, this research underscores the importance of personalized patient care and the need for continued innovation in dental prosthetics to enhance quality of life for individuals with tooth loss. and also the 3 scenarios below Scenario 1: Removable Dentures Patient Profile: A 65-year-old retired teacher with extensive tooth loss due to age and periodontal disease, seeking an affordable and non-invasive solution. Scenario: The patient has a limited budget and prefers a solution that doesn't require surgical intervention. The patient values ease of maintenance and the ability to adjust or replace the dentures if necessary. Suitability: Removable dentures are most suitable for this patient due to their cost-effectiveness and non-invasive nature. They provide a functional and aesthetic solution without the need for surgery, making it an ideal choice for patients with extensive tooth loss or those who prefer a less permanent option. Scenario 2: Fixed Bridges Patient Profile: A 45-year-old professional with one missing tooth between two healthy teeth, looking for a durable and aesthetically pleasing solution. Scenario: The patient is concerned about the longevity and appearance of the dental restoration. They have a stable oral health condition and prefer a solution that blends seamlessly with their natural teeth. Suitability: A fixed bridge is most suitable for this patient because it offers a durable, stable, and cosmetically appealing solution. The bridge uses the adjacent healthy teeth as anchors, providing a natural-looking replacement that can last many years with proper care. Scenario 3: Dental Implants Patient Profile: A 50-year-old avid traveler with a single missing tooth and excellent bone density, seeking a long-term and stable solution. Scenario: The patient is active and wants a worry-free solution that allows them to eat, speak, and travel without concerns about their dental restoration. They are in good overall health and willing to undergo a surgical procedure for a lasting result. Suitability: Dental implants are most suitable for this patient due to their durability, stability, and natural function. Implants are anchored directly into the jawbone, offering a permanent solution that mimics the look and feel of natural teeth. This option is ideal for patients seeking the most stable and long-term solution to tooth loss.
Comments/Acknowledgements
Presentation Category: IDS: First Year Literature Review