Additional Authors

Nicole Alvandian, DDS 2025; Dr. Jesse Manton, Dr. David Lam, Dr. Heesoo Oh, & Dr. Jonas Bianchi

Presentation Category

Research

Introduction/Context/Diagnosis

Objectives: Analyzing a patient’s nasal anatomy and airway space is valuable for orthodontics and anesthesiology and is possible using CBCT images captured for orthodontic treatment planning. Here, we developed and tested a novel protocol for measuring airway features along the inferior nasal passage in pre and post CBCT images of patients who received conventional orthodontic treatment. We aimed to determine if there were significant differences in the airway measurements between the two time points for each patient using this novel protocol. Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal observational study, CBCT images of each patient at two time points (T1 and T2) were oriented in Dolphin Imaging, focusing on ANS and PNS as the vertical and horizontal alignment landmarks, and then registered on the cranial base. The registered images were opened in ITK-SNAP for simultaneous measurements taken at the same CBCT slice. Using a novel protocol to measure nasal anatomy and airspace, 12 different measurements were taken across the anterior, middle, and posterior regions of the inferior nasal cavity for each image. We used SPSS to perform paired student t-tests for comparison of T2-T1. Results: The sample had an average age of 27.2 years (STD 8.89) with an average total treatment time of 20.7 months (STD 5.08). None of the 12 measurements in the 3 regions showed statistically significant differences between T2-T1. Conclusions: We developed a protocol for measurement that provided consistent data acquisition across the patient images. We found no statistically significant differences between airway measurements between the two time points. Future Directions: This study represents a bridge for applications such as determining optimal airway preparation for nasal intubation and examining the impact of orthodontic treatment on the nasal cavity's hard and soft tissue architecture. Acknowledgments: Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory at Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry

Comments/Acknowledgements

Presentation Category: Research

Location

Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA

Format

Presentation

Included in

Dentistry Commons

Share

COinS
 
May 8th, 2:15 PM May 8th, 5:00 PM

Advancements in Nasal Cavity Characterization: An Innovative Approach Using CBCt Imaging

Arthur A Dugoni School of Dentistry, 155 5th St, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA

Objectives: Analyzing a patient’s nasal anatomy and airway space is valuable for orthodontics and anesthesiology and is possible using CBCT images captured for orthodontic treatment planning. Here, we developed and tested a novel protocol for measuring airway features along the inferior nasal passage in pre and post CBCT images of patients who received conventional orthodontic treatment. We aimed to determine if there were significant differences in the airway measurements between the two time points for each patient using this novel protocol. Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal observational study, CBCT images of each patient at two time points (T1 and T2) were oriented in Dolphin Imaging, focusing on ANS and PNS as the vertical and horizontal alignment landmarks, and then registered on the cranial base. The registered images were opened in ITK-SNAP for simultaneous measurements taken at the same CBCT slice. Using a novel protocol to measure nasal anatomy and airspace, 12 different measurements were taken across the anterior, middle, and posterior regions of the inferior nasal cavity for each image. We used SPSS to perform paired student t-tests for comparison of T2-T1. Results: The sample had an average age of 27.2 years (STD 8.89) with an average total treatment time of 20.7 months (STD 5.08). None of the 12 measurements in the 3 regions showed statistically significant differences between T2-T1. Conclusions: We developed a protocol for measurement that provided consistent data acquisition across the patient images. We found no statistically significant differences between airway measurements between the two time points. Future Directions: This study represents a bridge for applications such as determining optimal airway preparation for nasal intubation and examining the impact of orthodontic treatment on the nasal cavity's hard and soft tissue architecture. Acknowledgments: Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory at Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry

 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.