Poor Correspondence Between Self-Report and Behavior: College Students' Definitions and Free-Pours of Standard Alcohol Servings

ORCID

Carolynn Kohn: 0000-0002-2156-4898

Document Type

Poster

Department

Psychology

Conference Title

Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International

Location

Chicago, IL

Conference Dates

May 27-31, 2016

Date of Presentation

5-30-2016

Abstract

College students have difficulty defining a standard drink of alcohol, calling into question the reliability and validity of aggregated college student drinking self-report surveys. The current study compared 192 college students self-reported definitions of standard portions of beer, wine, and hard liquor to their behavior (free-pours). Aggregated data suggest participants were fairly accurate at defining a standard drink of beer (M=10.8 oz, SD=3.8 oz), but not wine (M=7.7 oz, SD=6.4 oz) or liquor (M=2.6 oz, SD=2.3 oz). Aggregated free-pour data suggest participants were fairly accurate at pouring a standard serving of beer (M=10.7 oz, SD=2.5 oz), wine (M=4.9 oz, SD=1.4 oz), and liquor (M=1.27 oz, SD=0.52 oz). Correlations between individual standard drink definitions and corresponding free-pours of beer, wine, and liquor were low (r=.193, p<01, r=.377, p<.001, and r=.134, p=.13, respectively). When each individuals pour was plotted against his or her definition, there was virtually no correspondence between their definition and their free-pour for all three alcohol types (Figure 1). Aggregate results mirror data from group studies, but single-subject analyses highlight the potential low reliability and validity of self-reported drinking, often the only data used to inform intervention, prevention, and policy decisions. Recommendations and suggestions for future research are discussed.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS