Campus Access Only
All rights reserved. This publication is intended for use solely by faculty, students, and staff of University of the Pacific. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or later developed, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author or the publisher.
Date of Award
Dissertation - Pacific Access Restricted
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
Lois N. Harrison
First Committee Member
J. Marc Jantzen
Second Committee Member
Gwenneth L. Browne
Third Committee Member
Fourth Committee Member
Robert R. Orpinela
Fifth Committee Member
Helmut H. Riemer
Purpose: The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate the hypothesis that the practices of conceptual art have implications for music education.
Procedure for the Study: After an introduction in which conceptual art is described and defined as a modern experiential art form, the study includes: 1. presentation of historical antecedents for conceptual art; 2. description of the development of conceptual art and its various practices, chronologically; 3. comparison and contrast of five extant theories of art with conceptual art in order to demonstrate conceptual art's apparent inexplicability; 4. distillation and summary of fifteen characteristics of conceptual art; 5. application of the implications drawn from these characteristics to general principles of music education.
Findings: Historical antecedents began with Post-Impressionist thought in the arts in general. The "avant garde" aesthetic perspective included: 1. a trend toward greater freedom and individuality; 2. a search for commonality among the arts; 3. the desire to shed traditional, Romantic practices and methodologies. The development of conceptual art began with the work of Marcel Duchamp; new practices flowed from his experiments with non-objective art that blurred the line between art and non-art. The experiential quality of doing art became paramount especially in Futurist, Dadaist, and Surrealist movements. Musicians such as John Cage began working with new techniques and technologies. Assemblages, environments, and happenings dominated the radical, sometimes protestant, conceptual pieces of the SO's and 60's. The "idea" began to replace the "object" as the primary motivation for doing art in the 70's and 80 s. Conceptual art was found to be quite incompatible with five extant theories of art: Imitationism, Emotionalism, Expressionism, Communicationism, and Formalism. Fifteen characteristics were derived from the analysis and were explored for implications in music education.
Conclusions: Most of the characteristics of conceptual art have relevance to the current practice of music education. Benefits such as engendering individual creativity and expanding creative thinking are compatible and supported by music educators. Conceptual art may promote a sense of an interdisciplinary participation for the student of music, where ideas and processes can be exchanged across the curriculum. The practice of conceptual art is still experimental and defies categorization.
Saladino, Anthony Terrence. (1989). An analysis of the practices of conceptual art with implications for music education. University of the Pacific, Dissertation - Pacific Access Restricted. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/3175
To access this thesis/dissertation you must have a valid pacific.edu email address and log-in to Scholarly Commons.Find in PacificSearch
If you are the author and would like to grant permission to make your work openly accessible, please email
No Known Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/
The organization that has made the Item available reasonably believes that the Item is not restricted by copyright or related rights, but a conclusive determination could not be made. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use.