Date of Award
Master of Arts (M.A.)
The nineteenth century critics appraised Shakespeare's heroines by standards different from those of the twentieth; consequently the two ages reached different conclusions. The purpose of this paper is to point out just what these differences are.
A paper of this scope had to be narrowed in some ways. Otherwise a formidable array of heroines would have been enumerated, but little depth of research could have been shown. In the general conclusion the result would have been the same, as I have discovered through wide reading. To limit the subject only the most famous heroines could be included. The process of assembling a bibliography on the field of criticism of Shakespeare's heroines showed that some heroines bad been fully discussed, while others had been given little in the way of criticism. A great mass of material on a certain heroine, for example, would show that, since she was considered important by many writers of a certain period, she should be given consideration in this discussion. In this way the number of heroines discussed in this paper was limited to seven: Portia (in Merchant of Venice), Rosalind, Juliet, Ophelia, Desdemona, Cleopatra, and Lady Macbeth.
Gartman, Grace McLeod. (1950). A comparison of the nineteenth and twentieth century criticism of Shakespeare's heroines. University of the Pacific, Thesis. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1132
Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Playwriting Commons, Theatre History Commons, Women's Studies Commons