Date of Award
2026
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
Department
Transformative Action in Education
First Advisor
Rachelle Kisst Hackett, Ph.D.
First Committee Member
Sergio L. Sanchez, Ph.D.
Second Committee Member
Debbie Azevedo, Ed.D.
Abstract
This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study examined whether an alternative English Language Development (ELD) scheduling model influenced ninth-grade Long-Term English Learners’ (LTELs) attitudes toward school and perceived control at a California high school operating on a block schedule. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000), the study explored how differing ELD scheduling models may shape students’ experiences related to autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Specifically, the study compared ninth-grade LTEL students who participated in a traditional 90-minute ELD course during the 2023-24 school year with students who participated in an alternative scheduling model during the 2024-25 school year in which designated ELD instruction was embedded within a required course.
Quantitative data were collected using the School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised (SAAS-R) and the Perceived Control at School Scale (PCSS). Descriptive statistics were used to compare overall scores and subscale scores between cohorts. Qualitative data were collected through virtual focus groups conducted using Microsoft Teams and analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Results indicated that students in the traditional ELD scheduling model reported slightly higher attitudes toward school and perceived control scores than students in the alternative scheduling model. Qualitative findings revealed three major themes: Belonging and Recognition, Control and Choice in Learning, and Relationships and Support. Students across both cohorts emphasized the importance of teacher relationships, encouragement, and classroom belonging in shaping their school experience. Students in the alternative scheduling model described appreciating the increased scheduling flexibility and access to electives, while also expressing limited opportunities for voice in decision-making in learning.
Although the findings do not suggest that the alternative scheduling model improved student attitudes or perceived control, the results highlight the importance of relational and instructional conditions in shaping LTEL student experiences. The study suggests that structural scheduling changes alone may not be sufficient to improve student motivation, engagement, or sense of agency without intentional attention to relationships, support, and student voice.
Pages
112
Recommended Citation
Rashada, Kira (2026). Alternative English Language Development Scheduling in High School: Long-Term English Learners’ Attitudes and Perceived Control. University of the Pacific, Dissertation. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/4340
Rights Statement
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).