Campus Access Only

All rights reserved. This publication is intended for use solely by faculty, students, and staff of University of the Pacific. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or later developed, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author or the publisher.

Title

The Effectiveness Of Administrative Pre-Service Training As Perceived By Public School Principals Trained Under The Ryan Act

Date of Award

1981

Document Type

Dissertation - Pacific Access Restricted

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of administrative pre-service training under Ryan Act programs. The study was concerned specifically with (1) determining the competencies considered most important by principals, (2) determining the adequacy of training on identified competencies, (3) determining if principals from the elementary, junior high, and high school levels had different competency needs, and (4) determining if principals from the elementary, junior high, and high school levels view the adequacy of their training differently. Procedure. A survey instrument containing thirty-seven competencies organized into six general categories was developed through a review of the literature. The survey instrument was examined to determine its reliability and validity. The respondent was to rate the importance of each competency and the adequacy of the training received on that competency. The survey instrument was sent to 113 principals who had received their administrative credential through a Ryan Act program. Findings. A total of 74 percent of the surveys were returned. Of the thirty-seven competencies, fourteen competencies scored below a mid-point score of 3.0 on a five point scale indicating that the principals did not feel adequately trained on those specific competencies. The results of an ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference on how principals from the elementary, junior high, and high school levels perceived the importance of each category or the adequacy of the training they received. The principals surveyed indicated that all competencies were important, but that those in the category of leadership were the most important. On adequacy of training the principals indicated that governance and legal processes was the category in which they felt most adequately trained. Conclusions. (1) The competencies listed in the study present a reasonably comprehensive perspective of the principal's role. (2) Principals felt adequately trained to perform the competencies of their position. (3) There appears to be no significant difference between principals from the elementary, junior high, and high school levels as to the importance of competencies used in this study. (4) There appears to be no significant difference between principals from the elementary, junior high, and high school levels as to the adequacy of training they received on the competencies used in this study. Recommendations. (1) This study should be repeated in approximately five years when a greater number of respondents should be available to participate. (2) Recommendations for program improvement should be field tested at an institution of higher education with a follow-up study made of the program graduates. (3) A study should be made to determine the best time and method for delivery of administrative competencies.

This document is currently not available here.

To access this thesis/dissertation you must have a valid pacific.edu email address and log-in to Scholarly Commons.

Find in ProQuest

Share

COinS

If you are the author and would like to grant permission to make your work openly accessible, please email