Campus Access Only

All rights reserved. This publication is intended for use solely by faculty, students, and staff of University of the Pacific. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or later developed, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author or the publisher.

Date of Award

1995

Document Type

Dissertation - Pacific Access Restricted

Degree Name

Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)

Department

Education

First Advisor

Dennis C. Brennan

First Committee Member

Stephen E. Trotter

Second Committee Member

Estelle Lau

Third Committee Member

Mari G. Irvin

Fourth Committee Member

Frederick A. Wentworth

Abstract

The purpose of this study, the first of its kind, was undertaken in order to provide an initial description of the various Court and Community School/Day Center programs found within the State of California. Similarities and differences were delineated. A survey was distributed to the 52 counties within California that operated Court and Community School/Day Center programs during the 1993-94 school year. The major areas studied were: (1) curriculum, (2) curriculum development, (3) program philosophy, (4) student assessment, (5) program location, (6) administrative backgrounds, (7) teacher choice, induction, and evaluation, (8) discipline philosophy, (9) student traits, (10) student counseling services, and (11) community agency partnerships. Analysis of the findings indicated that although California Court and Community School/Day Center programs are alternative placements for at-risk students, the strategies implemented were similar to mainstream educational programs. There was evidence to support the notion that many of these educational programs were beginning the implementation of several alternative strategies in all areas; however, California Court and Community School/Day Center programs above all else may not be as alternative as the name suggests.

Pages

411

To access this thesis/dissertation you must have a valid pacific.edu email address and log-in to Scholarly Commons.

Find in PacificSearch Find in ProQuest

Share

COinS

If you are the author and would like to grant permission to make your work openly accessible, please email

 

Rights Statement

Rights Statement

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).