R[obert] U[nderwood] Johnson
before him early in his in[illegible]bency and that we hope to present to him such conclusive arguments as to justify him in following the pre[illegible] of ex-Secretary Hitchcock and not that of Secretary Garfield ex-Secretary Noble being also on our side.I shall see Wickerhaw tomorrow, if not today.Reed Smoo[illegible], of the Senate Committee [on?] R[illegible] Lands writes me that in his judgment the resolution will not be [illegible]ed by the Committee at this session. I am on good terms with him & with Newlands, both able sand influential senators.A story point I am making is that an Act of Congress with a definite purpose cannot be nullified by an administrative that passed later. You see that [Whitman?] [illegible]ed this point admirably before the House Com. John Sharp Williams takes the views that the Garfield grant is legislation. He goes out March 4 but I think [Champ?] Clark will take this view. Faithfully yoursR. U. Johnson
1909 Feb 22
Original letter dimensions: 20.5 x 13 cm.
Reel 18, Image 0254
Copyright status unknown
Some letters written to John Muir may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.). Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user.
University of the Pacific Library Holt-Atherton Special Collections. Please contact this institution directly to obtain copies of the images or permission to publish or use them beyond educational purposes.
John Muir, correspondence, letters, author, writing, naturalist, California, correspondent, mail, message, post, exchange of letters, missive, notes, epistle