R[obert] U[nderwood] Johnson
before him early in his in[illegible]bency and that we hope to present to him such conclusive arguments as to justify him in following the pre[illegible] of ex-Secretary Hitchcock and not that of Secretary Garfield ex-Secretary Noble being also on our side.I shall see Wickerhaw tomorrow, if not today.Reed Smoo[illegible], of the Senate Committee [on?] R[illegible] Lands writes me that in his judgment the resolution will not be [illegible]ed by the Committee at this session. I am on good terms with him & with Newlands, both able sand influential senators.A story point I am making is that an Act of Congress with a definite purpose cannot be nullified by an administrative that passed later. You see that [Whitman?] [illegible]ed this point admirably before the House Com. John Sharp Williams takes the views that the Garfield grant is legislation. He goes out March 4 but I think [Champ?] Clark will take this view. Faithfully yoursR. U. Johnson
1909 Feb 22
Original letter dimensions: 20.5 x 13 cm.
Reel 18, Image 0254
Copyright status unknown